"I see nothing incorrect about that statement and see it as WMI recognizing that hunters should have input but not an absolute say. "

Then you should also be able to see that hunters currently have NO say. Helluva long way between where we are currently and "total say". LMFAO!!! BIGTIME.

"Hunters like you and Cornboy are examples of why a statement like that would even come from a game management organization. "

And fools like yourself are why pgc is enabled to do the asnine things to us and our sport that they are currently.

"You have a one track mind when it comes to deer management and that track is more deer no matter what."

No moreseo than the KILL THE DEER KILL THE DEER KILL THE DEER to save the birds and trees mindset of pgc and the ecofools.

" You seem to keep forgetting that hunters alone own only a small percentage of the land that supports the herd. "

LMFAO!!! SO if we dont own the land there shouldnt be reasonable numbers of deer on the property?? Any land not having written documentation requesting more deer and being posted to allow it will be assumed to want MANY less deer. Brilliant you brainiac. That sounds like the words of a complete moron. The majority of landowners did not clammor for deer slaughter. A few extremists did. People who want less deer have tools to make it happen. No excuse for statewide slaughter.
None. That justification is nothing more than more solid PGC ar$e kissing on your part.