ORIGINAL: bluebird2
The point is you referred to the audit as being objective ,even though it hadn't even been started.. You say we should all expect a objective audit, but that is just your opinion and carries no more weight that those that think the audit will be biased. We are all entitled to our opinions and they will have no effect on the outcome of the audit ,so expressing those opinions does no harm.
Why would you or anyone else expect an objective audit when WMI has stated they support bio-diversity which requires a much lower deer density than the habitat can support on a sustainable basis ,which in turn results harvests that are 75% lower than if the herd was managed at the MSY carrying capacity.
So what you're saying is that in order for you to call an audit objective, the auditing firm mustadopt a goal of managing deer for maximum sustained numbers of deer without considering the habiata or other wildlife.
Thanks for confirming thatyou simply expect PA to be managed as one big deer farm.