ORIGINAL: bluebird2
Anyone who has been here any length of time knows that you have done your best to dispute the science of the current deer management plan. From your smoke and mirrors twists of fact to your laughable claim that folks like Dr Kroll, Charles Alsheimer, Dr Samuel etc simply "don't understand their own data", you have disputed the science all along. Now that an objective audit is getting started, you are back-pedaling before the thing even starts. LOL!
Looks like you decided the audit would be objective before you saw any results , yet you criticize others for expressing their opinion that the audit will be biased.
Yes, I expect the audit to be conducted in an objective manner. That should be the expected outcome of any audit by a third party contracted for that purpose. What I
didn't say is that we should accept it without scrutiny. All along I've said that it deserves scrutiny once completed.
You and Corny on the other hand have already concluded that it will be biased before it has even started and without having any legitimate facts to back up your position. By claiming bias before the fact, youexpose your own blatant unfounded bias on the subject.