ORIGINAL: bigbulls
ORIGINAL: GRIZZLYMAN
ORIGINAL: bigbulls
Wonder who's gonna be the first to hold Bowtch's feet to the fire for actually NOT taking the arch out of archery???[8D]
Theirslogan says they are "tak
ing" the arch out of archery. Not that they "took" the arch out of archery. Besides that this slogan was when they were actually taking the arch out of archery. They had some of the fastest bows on the market back then which did, in fact, take much of the arch out of archery.
I don't buy into Scent Lok's claims, but I think a lawsuit is overboard. A reasonably intelligent person should be able to make a decision based on his/her knowledge.
I am not trying to single you out but your response like thiswas the most recent. This is really meant for all that made similar comments.
So if a 14 year old hunter saved his hard earned lawn mowing money to purchase his___________(insert any brand here) carbon basedclothing so he could be a better hunter and get closer to bigger bucks like___________ (insert any "pro" hunters name here)because they all say it works all of the time every time andall he has to do is throw it in a dryer and it isgood as newhe should just suck it up and be glad that it only cost him $250 instead of $1250???????????
What if I sold you a carbon based water filtration kit and told you that all you had to do is throw the carbon bag filterin the dryer to reactivate the carbon and you could continue to use it indefinetly with no worries of health risks. One camping trip you come down with a life threatening illness that is directly linked to contaminated water. You believed my claims and followed my directions to a "T" but you have since learned that I was completely full of BS and none of my claims heald any merit what so ever. Would you just suck it up or would you sue me?
I hope they loose their butts in this law suit.
After all, when has a bow ever performed to it's advertised IBO speed?
My Bowtechs have. Some have even done better than advertised IBO speeds.
Even when I was 14, which was a lot of years ago, I was taught not to take advertiser's claims at face value. Maybe I was raised differently than most.
But, yes, I would suck it up, and move on, because it is a lesson learned the hard way that will stay with me the rest of my life.
So by that logic a manufacturer of an item can make any claim that they want about their item and when it doesn't perform as advertised every one that purchased that itemshould just suck it up because they learned a "life lesson"and there be no legal liability what so ever for the manufacturer.
Man I wish everyone thought the same way that you do because if that is your reasoning I have anew "invention"that is "scientifically proven" to allow the hunter to kill more bucks.I will sell you this "invention" for $250 dollars eachand I
guarantee you that if you follow my directions to the "T" you will see and kill more record book deer than you ever have before. I guarantee it will work 100% every time. Want one?
Unless you have hard data that I can verify independently, or your claims are backed with a warranty, and you have the
wherewithal to back it, your guarantee isn't worth squat to me.
I deal in facts in my line of work, and use logic to determine what those facts are telling me. I realize that I might be in a minority here, but that is the way I was raised and I still don't shell out major dollars until I'm satisfied that the investment is worth it. That is why I have never bought Scent Lok. The claims don't match the science, and it isn't too hard to ascertain that if you are willing to do some research.