Well Jim, gee i donno. I wasnt exactly directed by the legislators to search out the auditor, nor was I given the details of all those that placed bids!!

There couldnt have been a worse choice if objectivity was desired. That was supposed to be the case, but as we are finding out, thats nothing but a joke. Others may have been better....

Even if NOONE else couldve done an audit, you dont do a half-arsed 100% biased audit. You do none at all, and resolve matter some other way. It doesnt matter though, as this audit will go forward, we will be screwed in the process and aint a thing gonna stop it now.

Btw, I have no idea what the hell you are talking about no "ties to Pa, deer or both". I have no problem with anyone that has ties to "deer" Lmao! Its the ANTIDEER arseholes I have a problem with.As for "ties to Pa" that was clearly stated by the legislators since day one. Not MY criteria. Supposedly theirs. Though I agree with them, thats exactly how it SHOULD have been, audit pgc with idiots that have ties to the organization is the most asnine thing Ive ever herd of short of Dr. Alts deer plan.