I agree with zubba about many things but mostly the nose. Looks to me as though the taxidermist only did 1/4 of the nose bumps as well so it's pretty noticeable...
Not a very good mount to someone who notices those types of things, but it is by all means a great buck.

When you ask people to analyze a mount, even if its great, the camera angles and the fact that you have people looking for errors creates problems. If it was a great mount, someone would find a problem with it.

Next buck, go to a different taxidermist, but don't read too much into all the negativity here, you shot a fantastic buck and should by no means belittle it because of an imperfect mount.

Congrats again!