Pike, we are supposed to believe, I guess, that this thorough evaluation will include EVERYTHING. LOL. Examining in depth, each issue being very complex iand time consuming in itself: herd health issues, past and present. Regeneration, past and present. Human conflict past and present. Evaluate various pgc data collection methods, Evaluate report system and rates etc. Cac suggestions and makeup, Herd size estimates past and present, probably evaluate our antler restriction, appropriateness of allocation to the goals, evaluate the goals, pgc/hunter communication and relations, Take all that stuff and more and compare to other states... And also possibly come up with alternative methods.

Done in an unbiased manner, by our new pgc commissioners work partners at wmi...All within a year so pgc can get their fee increase in a timely manner. LOL.

Funny thing is, this is what we are to believe, all this will be done and then some...and thoroughly...and under a year....yet look how long it takes Pgc to prepare and present only one years worth of data in the form of annual report which is only one year and doesnt even take into account the majority of this stuff the audit will look into!!