Sorry, if its crooked it crooked, if its not objective and thourough its not. if it IS, you neednt worry as we will see it for what it is.
Does that mean that you will cry "crooked" if the results arent what you want? Sure seems like it!
On the other hand, it seems you pretty much have your mind made up though. ITs already a great audit that should be swallowed whole no matter who does it or what is said, just because ifwe dont, you will accuse anyone who doesnt of having an agenda. As if anyone here cares more about your ridicule than they do the realsupposed purpose of this audit![8D]
Please show me where I said anything like that. I never used any words like great to describe the audit but you have already brought the word crooked into the mix and the thing hasn't even started yet! Personally, I just want the thing done with no matter what it winds up saying.
Sorry, but you dont dictate what is acceptable and what isnt. Especially100% blindlywith nothing even having taken place yet. Noones said the audit is definately gonna be crooked or not address the pertinenet details for sure.The very realPOSSIBILITY most certainly does exist the audit could be done in a manner not conducive to solving a thing. Though you may not believe that, just as you dont believe pgcbeing 100% direction dictated by econuts.
Most here would undoubtedly liketo see an attempt ataddressing these issues, thats why suggestions were asked for here, which it seems you still havent given, all you can do is pizz andmoan about others posts, as usual.
As opposed to pizzing and moaning about the results before the thing starts?
BTW, you dont dictate what is acceptable either! LOL
Dont like the discussion? Sorry bout yer luck, but it is what it is, and there isnt a thing out of line here or that isnt consistent with hunter feelings about pgc.
Actually I'm finding this discussion quite amusing but it sure seems to have put a burr under your saddle
This audit is because of gross mismanagement and rock bottom hunter satisfaction level. It shouldntevenNEED to be occurring, if it werent for pgcs head beingfirmly up thier own arses. Dont expect those of us who aredisgruntled to all of a sudden trust everyone involved just because you think we should! No offense, but if we did what YOU thought we should, pgc woulda probably had a license fee increase of twice it is they are asking....8 years ago, along with half the deer we already have.
And as for someone being on the "expert panel" affiliated with say... Audubon, Most hunters wouldnt trust them any more than you'd trust Jim Slinsky himself todo an unbiasedaudit.
To use your words:
Sorry, but you dont dictate what is acceptable and what isnt.
Most wouldve liked legislative intervention to immediate fix the problems. Most didnt need an audit to know pgc where full of it. We can thank ol' "MEL" and Tim Shaeffer of Audubon for that not happening, and us having to settle for an audit in the first place. As stated, I find an audit better than "nothing". Nothing more, nothing less.
legislative intervention? Now there's a method that will truly accomplish the will of the people LOL LOL LOL
Like I said, it is both interesting and highly amusing that you already have your shorts in a bunch over the results and the bluebird is already disputing or spinning what hasn't even been written LMFAO!