Since it is impossible for you to provide logical answers to my questions ,once again you resort to distorting my position. The science behind the plan is obvious and the PGC has admitted it is based solely on the impact of deer on commercially valuable timber and the desires of various stake holders other than hunters. All I ask is that WMI solicit questions that the hunters would like to have answered in order to make the audit worthwhile with the hope that it will help resolve the divide between hunters and the PGC.
Anyone who has been here any length of time knows that you have done your best to dispute the science of the current deer management plan. From your smoke and mirrors twists of fact to your laughable claim that folks like Dr Kroll, Charles Alsheimer, Dr Samuel etc simply "don't understand their own data", you have disputed the science all along. Now that an objective audit is getting started, you are back-pedaling before the thing even starts. LOL!