In all of your arguements over the past years you have tried to create your own "science" to fit your agenda. You are now obviously afraid that objective "science" will not fit your agenda. That agenda has simply been to produce the maximum possible sustained number of deer without regard to the long term effects on the habitat and on other wildlife and even on the health and survival chances of the deer themselves.
Since it is impossible for you to provide logical answers to my questions ,once again you resort to distorting my position. The science behind the plan is obvious and the PGC has admitted it is based solely on the impact of deer on commercially valuable timber and the desires of various stake holders other than hunters. All I ask is that WMI solicit questions that the hunters would like to have answered in order to make the audit worthwhile with the hope that it will help resolve the divide between hunters and the PGC.