ORIGINAL: Cornelius08
"If I've told you once, I've told you a million times, don't exaggerate!
'
no exaggeration. Oversimplification? Maybe. But not for purposes of this discussion. I think we all know each others positions and get the "jist" of it. Generally speaking, you definatelysupport the deer plan as is if asked for a yes or no. I dont. You support giving them license fee increase with no changes and even without an audit I dont. You think for the most part they are doing a good job. I do not. You think they are doing things because of the habitat and herd health and not econuts. I dont. And crossbows arent what this audit is about.
You may think the deer plan "could use a bit of improvement" if and only if pgc so decides to. I think significant improvement should be demanded.
Given these differences of position, it only stands to reason you would be more optimistic about an audits results. I dont imagine you will be very upset no matter the results.
Almost.....
I do indeed support most of the deer management plan but am beginning to be disturbed by some of the silence most likely being caused by the lawsuit. I welcome an audit no matter the results and see it as the first step in ending this idiotic lawsuit so we can get on with things and work together to fix what IS broken.