"But really would any of you believe the answers given if they were not what you want to hear?"

Maybe, maybe not.Im not gonna blindly commit to anything...And anyone who would no matter what, would be a damn fool. It has nothing to do with what I want to or dont want to hear. Only thing I dont want to hear is biased nonsense thats clearly nonsense, or an audit that effectively circumvents the real issues, yet rubber stamps the program.My acceptancewill most definately depend on wether what is stated meshes with whatis definitively already known. But the suggestions are at least something I think should be looked at if they are gonna look at anything and give an opinion, may as well be the important details.

"I too am not happy with the direction we're heading, but I don't believe the head butt is the weapon of choice in this battle.[]

Some of the attacks here are way past passion and more personal, than necessary.[:@] "

They werent attacks. they were accurate observations, and while it may not solve anything, neither will those people spoken ofwho are a big part of our problems and have been for years. Also, its not "way past passion". There are big problems in our state, and I dont think we hunters should look kindly upon big contributors to those problems. You can go to the aforementioned "other site" and see similar comments from them directed towards people from our side on basically just about any given day as well....But since you apparently were offended, I'll make the effort to keep personal remarks toonly the necessary bareminimum.