Rsb, Id imagine that the same deal pgc is using. On the annual report, it stated the regeneration study was being conducted with dcnr. Browsed quickly if it had explained this "dire need" to change the evaluation method from previous year, I missed it. Doesnt matter. I wouldnt buy any trumped up explanation anyway. Its not hard to compare the relationship of deer and habitat now compared to previously, and the trends speak for themselves, and what they say is pgcis being far less than honest in expressing their "goals" and the extremes they are willing to go to in pacifying dcnr and audubon/other environmentalists.

The timber/econut organization....dcnr...has a great deal of "love" for deer as Im sure we are all aware! (LOL) And their "system" now dictating our deer numbers not only on state forest but everywhere else is nonsensical to say the least. If anyone ever had any doubt who was steering the ship, i think it is more than clear now.