As for the forest regeneration though that tells the professional manager that all is not well and that the deer herd is a critical juncture that needs to be controlled and closely monitored before the deer do both the habitat and themselves in to a poor future. Hunters don’t benefit from that poor habitat deer future either.
If that were true, 2F would be managed at a lower DD than 2G, but instead it is managed at almost twice the DD as 2G. That makes absolutely no sense and neither do your previous attempts to justify the discrepancy.