"It only makes sence to me to use science to make the desions they always said science dont lie"

Deer managementuses alot more than science alone. It takes alot of judgement calls and opinions. If those making the decisions are concerned more with biodiversity timber or whatever else the case may be, its only understandable they are gonna lean that way. And sometime a HARD lean. Even thoughthe plan may be just as "scientificallyvalid", but that isnt saying much if you are a hunter,when it could be just as much so, withappropriate decisions regarding hunting as well. And to do it right in the name of hunting, it takes hunter friendly biologists, boc, and or other staff. Not extreme environmentalists. It also doesnt help when you have dcnr collecting the data and having strong input into the regeneration study even on lands not sate forest.

This new development for 2A has eco-extremist all over it.