Thanks for showing everyone just how flawed your example really was. You doubled the sample size in the low breeding rate areas but that never happened in the real world. RSB claimed breeding rates in his district increased by 13 % ,but you kept the breeding rate at the same level as before Ars. Even with totally misrepresenting what happen your example only produced a 2% decrease instead of a 5% decrease, In other words , neither you or RSB have a leg or a crutch to stand on.