You also inserted unsupported assumed numbers directly the opposite of what RSB reported. I corrected that and you havent been able to justify the numbers you use since other than to falsely accuse people of lying without any supporting proof. When you call someone a liar, the burden of proof is on you and you have failed to do that Bluejob!
That is another flat out lie . You never provided any numbers that refuted the roadkill data I posted from the AWR , because no such data exists unless you just made up some numbers.
Here is the data from the AWR . Now show everyone how the number of do e checked was so much higher in 2F and 2G than in 2B and 5C!!!
Table 2. Number of does examined and assessment of deer health by WMU and
age class. Data are based on samples collected from 2004 to 2006,
Pennsylvania.
1-year-olds___
2 or 3-year-olds and older_
WMU n % Preg. Health n Embryos per doe Health WMU Health
1A 59 42 Good 61 1.51 Fair Fair
1B 49 22 Fair 64 1.72 Good Good
2A 46 11 Fair 74 1.45 Fair Fair
2B 109 25 Fair 136 1.54 Fair Fair
2C 67 25 Fair 89 1.27 Poor Poor
2D 59 20 Fair 47 1.68 Good Good
2E 8 38 Good 19 1.37 Poor Uncertain
2F 27 11 Fair 48 1.42 Fair Fair
2G 21 5 Poor 62 1.58 Fair Fair
3A 17 6 Poor 38 1.42 Fair Fair
3B 34 3 Poor 51 1.55 Fair Fair
3C 34 6 Poor 33 1.45 Fair Fair
3D 42 12 Fair 87 1.26 Poor Poor
4A 62 15 Fair 79 1.58 Fair Fair
4B 27 33 Good 291 1.921 Good1 Good1
4C 20 15 Fair 21 1.43 Fair Fair
4D 33 27 Fair 72 1.42 Fair Fair
4E 40 13 Fair 31 1.68 Good Good
5A 9 44 Good 14 1.36 Poor Uncertain
5B 40 25 Fair 41 1.44 Fair Fair
5C 63 37 Good 130 1.76 Good Good
5D 14 7 Poor 40 1.73 Good Good
1
Data based on 3-year-old fem