RSB pointed out that sample size had shifted. He didnt attempt to create a different result. He merely pointed out that the statewide results were an avergae created when the input had shifted. you responded by posting an intentionally distorted example, inserting information you made up, that was proven meaningless
That is an out right lie and you know it. I posted an example using reasonable shifts in sample size from areas with high breeding rates to low breeding rates and you came back with a ridiculous estimates that were totally unrelated to reality. I further supported my position showing that more does were still being checked in the areas with high breeding rates compared to those with low breeding rates and you and RSB had no logical rebuttal. Furthermore, RSB just admitted he didn't know how to make a rational comparison.