"Not lying Bluejob. We've been down this road before. RSB posted those facts. Just because you choose not to accept them doesn't change them or make them less true."

Your lying. Youve been down this road, and havent resolved a thing. Using the same "nothingness" that you have previously along with RSB, we can go down it 10 more times and the result will be the same. The data is clear as black and white. The "excuse" is unproven and another "RSB SPECIAL DAMAGE CONTROL" theory.

"Don't like that name? Too bad. IMO it's no worse than accusing someone of lying for posting a fact that you havesimply chosen to ignore"

I think he'll live with your vulgar childish name calling, but you are still a liar.At best, currently you are trying to force us to believe something that is undocumented, unproven, and unlikely.

The pgc data is shown in A COMPARABLE fashion. Statewide data in a comparison chart...and you are saying we arent supposed to compare it because its not comparable? Are you kiddin' me???[8D]

If the data had stayed the same it would have proved the excessive measures had not been necessary for herd health according to those measures. They didnt even stay the same...They DECLINED!