"First is the notable fact that only one very small organization has participated as an organization in the use of the fee increase for blackmail. All the rest are either on record supporting the increase or are neutral on the subject. "

That doesnt take into account INDIVIDUALS which are by far the huge majority. I have voiced support for withholding the fee increase and many others Iknow ofwith no affiliations have as well. I also have spoken via pm with many who have as well. After hearing about legislators takes on the issue, it seems they are and have been BOMBARDED with complaints about the deer program and nonsupport for fee increase. Ask someone in the real world wether they support a fee increase for the greed commission and they'll either laugh thinking you must be joking, or say things about pgc that I cannot repeat here..(LOL)

"Setting aside the USP website, which doesnt allow nonmembers to even view their forum. Everyoutdoor forum where PA is a subject other than this one shows overwhelming support for a license increase. "

Pa outdoors doesnt. Pa sportsman portal doesnt. Pa outdoor news poll didnt. I see NONE other than hpa. And I think we all can understand that! And btw, the pfsc is meaningless. Membership includes econuts even nonhunting econuts, and they are nothing more than a pgc political yes machine.....AND THATS A WELL KNOWN FACT!

Ive also posted SEVERAL polls on here in the past, from various sites that were by far against pgc. Most in the 80+% range.


"Finally, theres the age old documented fact that people tend to speak up when unhappy or angry but when content, we don't hear from them."

There is also an age old saying hunters are extremely nonpolitically involved and apathetic. Many grumble and do nothing. The HUGE majority in myopinion are against the deer plan.

"Of course this will induced a bold print technicolorranting tantrum from the cornhole and a barrage of numbers from the bird "

Neurological disfunction kicking in again eh?