ORIGINAL: Cornelius08

In 2G. More bucks were harvested total than 2A. You can manipulate the stats and flip them sideways if you like. Fact is, 2A has a lower buck harvest than both 2G and 2F.

"Since unit 2G is 4114.04 square miles, in size, it certainly should have a higher buck harvest then unit 2A which much less then half the half that size with only 1810.78 square miles. I would have thought anyone with a lick of intelligence and commonsense would have figured that out all by themselves though."

Hardly, when the carrying capacity of the habitat in 2A is over double under THE BEST of circumstances, yet 2g was said to be in TERRIBLE shape!!. Kinda neglected that lil tidbitin your words of wisdom didnt ya?? Comparing mature forest andwhat is claimed to be the worst area in the state, tofarmland, reverting farmland andedge habitat of the southwest? LOL. C'mon, if ya dont quit being rediculous, im gonna hafta break out my colored text and large font!LOL!!! You also overlooked the FACT that both 2F and 2D are much smaller than 2G, yet they both had higher buck harvests than 2g. 2d having MUCH MORE, with 9500!!! So put that in your cob corn pipe and smoke it! (LOL)

"That is why I post everything in harvests per square mile, to make then as equal, unbiased and comparable as possible."

But its not equal.That sounds like the "ONe size fits all" mantra you eco-folk are famous for spouting. Kill em all everywhere regardless of the habitat....[:'(] Anyway,You like to compare in any way that makes your point look legit when it isnt. In fact, you tendto change the topic to change the argument from its original base, since youhave no argument to present. My comment, which started your yapping, and that which was my concern was the herd goal not being adhered to. A complete SHAM if you will. Yet you jump AROUND the issue, and wont touch it. Course your elusiveness doesnt make you look any better than it would if you'd just take your lumps and say you were wrong.

"Also your home unit of 2A was forth highest in in the state in buck harvests."

Only by way of your rediculous comparison. Otherwise itsmiddle of the pack at 8 or9...

"That hardly seems like a unit that has been suffering from excessive deer harvests. So I have to say you are full of both nonsense and horse puckey."

A liar with an agendaWOULD say that. The overharvest is easily seen by comparing the harvest goal to the results... THE GOAL IS STABILIZATION. Something you have yet again conveniently ignored. Care to quit being a liar and address the real issue for a change??


Read carefully, and im NOT yelling, this is so you can see it. Seems you go conveniently blind the last 15 times Ive posted it.

THE GOAL FOR 2A HAS BEEN STABILIZATION FOR YEARS, YET THE HARVEST AND HERD HAS DECLINED DURING THAT PERIOD SIGNIFICANTLY....AS HAS THE DOE HARVEST... = PGC LYING, and now, YOU LYING ABOUT THEIR LYING!!!