ORIGINAL: Cornelius08
Facts?
"You don’t post facts. All you post are your biased opinions and those aren’t facts. "
I constantly post facts. I also post opinions. Problem is you dont know the difference obviously. Your heavy bias and rediculous damage control efforts with very little to work with, are what make you post statements such as the above.
"You constantly attack the entire integrity of the Board of Game Commissioners and the Game Commission as an agency. "
Nope. I attack the views and actions of the latest majority of the boc. I happen to think boop does a damn fine job and occassionally others. Doesnt do them much good though when there are a slight majority who constantly undercut them and the sportsmen of our state. I reserve my opinion of those I know little about. Wiener for example. I applaud his opposition to crossbows, but he hasnt been battle tested so i reserve my opinion. This thread also isnt about current commissioners, but about possible future ones.
"Well that agency is made up of people. In fact, it is made up of some of the most highly trained and professional people that this state or country has to offer. "
That doesnt mean anyone is wrong about them. Audubon and others including some antihunting organizations have highly educated people in their organizations. Education alone is meaningless. People have to also have the good intention. And that is very open to interpretation depending on who you are and what your interests are, and expectations from management. Timber isnt gonna see the same as hunter, and birdwatcher isnt either. And the catering generally leans in a direction, sometimes heavily.
"I dare say that you most certainly are not only biased but also lacking in any real knowledge about many of the subjects you jump into. "
I know more than you on every topic Ive ever discussed with you. Frankly I just dont find your IQ up to par, and thats not a jab. Thats a fact. You at least have the materials to present a good argument at the very least. You fail to doeven that. Your rediculous notions are picked apartwithin seconds, and your left with your head hanging and hurling insults.You could have access to more information to use in your arguments, but it does you little good, its IMPOSSIBLE to winwhen your not a very good/intellectual debater and you are on the opposite side of the truthto boot.
It is not only obvious that you don’t know much of anything about any of the Commissioners, past or present and that you really don’t believe in the democratic system in which people vote on a common direction for the good of the future.
The reason there is a Board of Commissioners is to prevent one or two people from making decisions that aren’t the direction the majority want for the future.
As near as I can see, and I am confident most readers beyond you and the other handful of malcontents and other USP sympathizers, agree that what you are apposed to is anyone that has enough knowledge to understand the inter-relationships between wildlife populations and their habitats and food supplies. In other words you are opposed to anyone that is willing to do the right thing by listening to the management professionals instead of the least educated people concerning deer management or other environmental management issues.
But, since you claim you really wanted to talk about facts, why don’t you go ahead and post some. So far I can’t recall nay facts you posted. As I already pointed out your opinions are not facts anywhere accept in your own head.
R.S. Bodenhorn