ORIGINAL: Cornelius08

Sorry, I dont see ecoextremists who value the opinion that deer are "MOUNTAIN MAGGOTS" as having common sense.

And yes, Id say many on here would be a better candidate. The boc was supposed to be set up "of the people". Pgc has biologists. More arent needed on the boc. Especially if they are highly biased with an antideer agenda. Some extremely intelligent folks are members of groups that simply want extremelyfewer deer because of their own agendas. Thats fine and dandy, but is 100% counter to hunters.

Also, though just an example, there are some VERY educated people who do VERY stupid things every single day, not to mention highly educated men and women who also happen to be members of Audubon, Peta, religious cults(LOL)... I know of an extremely strange gentleman who is VERY weird, talks to himself, wears nylons, but back inthe 80'she got his degree in early childhood development. Perhaps he can come over and babysitsome of these guyskids or grandkids sometime? After all...Hes educated. (LOL)[:'(]


Then what many arent seeing is, if this joker does get that seat.... What is this gonna do to the audit?? We were promised an audit before a license increase!! How are we gonna have an audit done by WMI, when this clown WORKED FOR THEM, has often worked with pgc as well...and is now a Pgc Commissioner?? No way in hell that can fly!! So we will be stuck with our agency going broke, or more likely the hunters getting no answers but getting screwed yet again, and pgc permitted to "stay the course", with an unconditional fee increase being granted and enabling it all. This really stinks and Im beginning to smell wrong-doing (big surprise with pgc huh?). Too much coincidence to be coincidenceand would provide yet one more easy way out for the very slippery pgc.