HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Putting Lehigh bullets to the test.
View Single Post
Old 03-17-2009 | 07:26 AM
  #23  
SWThomas's Avatar
SWThomas
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,869
Likes: 0
From: Camp Lejeune, NC
Default RE: Putting Lehigh bullets to the test.

ORIGINAL: sabotloader

ronlaughlin

Just my opinion, but a better performing bullet has not been produced, since John invented the partition in 1947. Sure, there are 'prettier' bullets out there, and there are certainly bullets that fly better, but when it comes to tissue damage and penetration, is there anything better? Besides, the partition B.C. is plenty good for shots to 200 yd; even some beyond.
Amen...

The one thing you did not mention is that it is known fact that a Nosler will expand over a wider range of velocity than any other bullet.
Like I said, it's just my opinion. You guys definitely have way more experience with different bullets and ballistics than I. I'm just basing my opinion on the fact that Nosler bullets have a lead core (or rather 2 lead cores in Partitions) and that lead fragments on impact. I have seen pictures of Nosler bullets that have expanded and most of the lead that was in the nose core was gone. That would mean it lost some of it's weight. I certainly don't discount the long range abilities of Nosler Partitions after seeing Jim Shockey shoot a Caribou with one at 260 yards. That was pretty impressive but that also has a lot to do with the shooter. But the bullet performed great and anchored that Caribou where it stood.

I'm not afraid to admit that I'm wrong because like I said, there is a lot about muzzleloading that I do not know. So if you fellas are saying there is data out there to prove that Nosler bullets are that good, I'm inclined to believe you.
SWThomas is offline  
Reply