"Reason two goes to Streets credibility and his obvious published agenda. He has demonstrated his agenda time and again and his bias is unquestionable.He absolutelyhas reason to want the current deer plan to come out looking badbecause he has already drawn his conclusions and made them very public."

He has made many FACTUAL statements public from the best I can tell... And it doesnt matter WHAT his personal feelings on the issue are, the audubon involvement and the "dirty dealings" dont smell any better no matter how you look at it.

Also, even if he had an "agenda" Id be very interested in hearingyou please explain why that is any different than what Audubon and Mr. Shaefferalong with zullinger and others have been attempting to do all along with the audit and all other "shows" they have put on throught the years so that the deer plan could "stay the course" unfettered? Yet for some obtuse reason, youseem to think THAT is ok?