The guys resume is impressive but he is not exactly a practicing wildlife biologist.

Both documents Cite Eveland exactly6 times total, three times in each document and the latest thing they used from his work is 30 years old.

Alt is referenced 191 times by comparison.

OK now we know who he is or more accurately WAS. His newest workasreferenced by the commission is 30 years old and I could find nothing referencingany work with deer.

One cant help but wonder why Street would cite a guy who's last referenced work in PA was relevant in the 70's as the "best" candidate to do the deer audit???? How current can this guy be? What are his current credentials?

Streets opinions are most certainly stuck in the 70's.Could it be that thats why he is pushing Eveland?

BTW, By the address and phone number, it seems this guy is practically my neighbor. His phone exchange is entirely contained within 3-10 miles of me. That may allow me to find out a bit more.


BTW Maverick, Where, exactly did you find that Bio? Do you have a link?