Yeah rem, thats the impression I got too when I first read the piece. Definately should make any Pa hunter raise an eyebrow at the very least.

Ive been doing some re-reading on the netof some of the things spoken of in the piece and everything appears to be as stated, at least that which can be corroborated.

I also dont doubt the meetings with Schaeffer/Zullinger with legislators. They were very passionate in their letter requesting no moves be made to change pgc or the deer plan. I also know how Schaeffer and audubon have been VERY pushy andover eager to delve into the deer management plan for years, and have little doubt they also tried to force their way into the particulars of the audit deal. Audubon was one of the groups asked forthoughts on deer management goals prior to the plan. Audubonwas instrumental in the inception and continuationof our extreme hr, they are among those whose opinions are asked whendetermining game land usage issues and from the looks of it, they apparently had a finger in the audit pot. Those fools are like a TERRIBLE rash that just won't go away. Why is that? Because they apparently have "pull" through pgc higher ups. Otherwise, in a hunter friendly system, theyd have been put in their place long ago. They have been permitted to be a FAR too big of a part of game management. And they do so, because they can.[:'(]