You could look at it that way. But if indeed Tim Shaeffer and 'Mel had dealings with legislators and any of that stuff is true, it definately isnt something the sportsmen of our state should turn a blind eye to.


Some things that I have thought odd, were:

1. LEVDANSKY took the initiative???? I thought that VERY bizarre at the time!
2. Noone else was available, andEveland was never even mentioned? and 2B. (LOL) WMI backed off due to the pgc unwillingness to comply because of the lawsuit...So why not go with Eveland now? Why?...Because he wouldnt be going with a proposal that was stamped by audubon.
3.The "ties" of all the players to the same "forest heritage campaign" does NOT look good.
4. I remember well when Zullinger and Shaeffer wrote their letter asking for more time before changes are made...Then proceeded to give THEIR audit proposal? Sorry, but that stinks to high heaven.
5. Anytime AUDUBON is involved in GAME management, I can guarantee its not a GOOD thing, and good things are not about to happen. Mr. Shaeffer gave far more input into our deer plan than ever shouldve occurred, along with the rediculous deermanagement report bythe "deer management team" captained by audubon.