Not surprising coming from Street. I guess he finally stepped off his decades long anti bowhunter campaign.
Corny, are you aware that thishack has tirelessly campaigned to rescind the last two weeks of bow season since we got it back in the 90's claiming that archers are taking all the good bucks by getting an unfair first crack at them? His latest mantra is that we take all the best bucks out before they can breed.
No Btb, I had no idea of that. I don't know much about the guy or anything. Just saw the post on another board, knew some of it was accurate, and found it interesting. If his views differ from mine on the bowseason, then I disagree with him in THAT AREA 100%.
I do see that he had some pretty accurate assessement of the Audubon involvement, and found the Tim Shaeffer dealing to be "underhanded" to say the least. Audubon has been pretty obvious in their attempts to "undercut" us in the wildlife management arena. Alot of this brings into question the validity of any upcoming audit. It should be looked at with a MICROSCOPE by the sportsmen of our state, and not just sucked up and accepted no matter how it is done.
You're sweating the small stuff in regards to your opinions on small details in the article, wether accurate or not. Fact is, enough is accurate beyond doubt, to make one question this "audit" due to heavy audubon involvment, and also yet again call good ol' "Zullinger's" motives into question.
Only thing that was new to me, was the fact audubon had their hand in the "audit" proposal, and naturally want the results to be what THEY desire. Not surprised. On the other hand, Alot of thisare things that many of us already had been following for some time now and knew, yet posting from anothers perspective and perhaps enlightening a few is never a bad thing. Especially when it comes to protecting our hunting heritage in Pa from the #1 enemy we face today. Eco-extremists.