I on the other hand, besides being very stubborn, have an uncommon amount of patience (though it too can be pretty short at time) will use you misguided naysayer’s as a method to get the correct information out to those readers with an open mind and enough commonsense to accept the real facts about the deer/habitat relationships.
Then you should consider yourself to be a failure because you haven't provided the correct information, to the readers of the MBs . You said breeding rates would increase as the herd was reduced off setting the effects of HR and breeding rates decreased. You said the buck harvests would return to normal after the first year of AR and instead they steadily decreased. You said there was a problem with the B/D ratio and that wasn't true You claim the habitat in 2G is controlling the herd and that isn't true. You can't explain why 2F is being managed at almost twice the DD as 2G or why all the WMUs adjacent to 2G have much higher DDs. You disagree with the trained professionals in the PGC and distort data to support your misguided theories.
BTW, my compliment was quite sincere since I have read about your enforcement work and your dedication to your profession.