HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - What's wrong with the 7mm. Rem. Mag???
View Single Post
Old 03-06-2009 | 04:53 PM
  #22  
Dozen Arrows
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 866
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: What's wrong with the 7mm. Rem. Mag???

ORIGINAL: Ron Duval

If you need more punch than you can get with the wonderful .30-06 (or .280), I would go to a .300 magnum of some sort. The 7mm Rem Mag does not signifigantly beat the .30-06 with the heavier bullets. The .30-06 gets about the same velocity from a 180 gr bullet as the 7mm Rem Mag does with the 175. The.284" does have a better ballistic coefficient and sectional density than the .308", but at most reasonable distances the difference in trajectory is small.
The .300 Win Mag will throw a 180 gr pill 150 fps faster than a .30-06. If you handload you can make a .300 Win Magbehave the same as a .30-06 easily. Load it hot for elk, load it mild for deer.

Ask your gunsmith for some advice on chambering. I have never met one that did not have strong informed opinions.
Mostly because of that reason right there, the 300 Win Mag. But I don't see any reason why a 7mm Rem Mag can't be a happy median between the 30 O6' and the 300 Win Mag..... JMO

I had a 30 O6' and liked it. I had a 7mm Rem Mag and loved it. I have a 300 Win Mag and love it.
Dozen Arrows is offline  
Reply