Here is the link to the report which I quoted and you obviously haven't read.
http://pubs.cas.psu.edu/FreePubs/pdfs/uh097.pdf
So big deal, you managed to find one paragraph where deer werent mentioned. The fact that you would even try to post just that one small snippet as evidence that Penn States researchers dont consider deer is simply ridiculous. It just proves once again that you will go to any length to perpetuate your warped agenda.
Once again it is you that is busted for falsely accusing me of taking the paragraph I quoted out of context and misrepresenting the content of the report. We all know that all foresters consider deer to be a potential problem regarding regeneration, but the report I quoted clearly shows that the deer have not been devastating our forests for the past 80 years.
Here is another quote from the report citing the increase in forested land.
According to U.S. Forest Service inventories, forest
areas are actually increasing in Pennsylvania. Forest
area throughout the Commonwealth is currently at its
highest level since the late nineteenth century. In the
heavily populated Southeast, forestland increased
more than 6 percent between 1978 and 1989. Likewise,
it increased 4.5 percent in the Northeast and 3 percent
in the West. Even in the Poconos, an area of rapid
population growth, total forestland increased 1
percent. Today, about 60 percent of Pennsylvania is
forested.
Once again there is no mention of deer preventing regeneration and according for a decrease in the amount of forested land.