Yes, you are busted once again!
You presented one paragraph and tried to pass it off as evidence that Penn State didnt consider the negative effects of deer on regeneration.
You said:
Note, there is no mention of a problem of over browsing by deer!!!!
So big deal, you managed to find one paragraph where deer werent mentioned. The fact that you would even try to post just that one small snippet as evidence that Penn States researchers dont consider deer is simply ridiculous. It just proves once again that you will go to any length to perpetuate your warped agenda.