As for the deer numbers in the units around 2G that too has been explained. All of the units have different habitat that supports different numbers of deer. All of those units also have a management goal and objective that fits that unit, instead of just one management objective for all units.
Without a doubt you are a champion spinmeister and some true believers and blind followers may even believe your spin. But , others were paying attention when the PGC told us that all WMU's were being managed with a goal of good herd and forest health and low deer/human conflicts. They PGC also claimed that the herd was not being managed on deer density goals for individual WMUs.
Therefore, unless you are claiming the acceptable goal for 2F and 2G is poor forest health and it doesn't matter how many deer each unit has, your explanation makes no sense.
In some areas the habitat is supporting far more then 25 deer per square mile. In other areas it is very obvious the habitat doesn’t support any way near that number of deer, and the deer themselves prove that too.
While that is true, it is also true that the study said the(average) habitat in the NC counties supported an average DD of 25 DPSM for 80 years, so your claim that the habitat is controlling the herd in 2G at 8 DPSM ,is simply ridiculous.