houldn't it be obvious to you by now that you're obviously not aware of ALL the criteria they use? With all the misguided armchair biologists out there now who can't understand the simplest of deer management principles, who could blame the biologists for not disclosing lesser criteria that might be in play?
I fully understand and am aware all the criteria they use, and that is why I know they are lying when they claim that the herd is being managed based on herd health ,forest health and deer/human conflicts. If the goal is good forest health they would still be reducing the herd in all but one WMU ,which is the only WMU that is at it's goal for forest health and 2F and 2G would be managed at the same densities.
Do you have an explanation regarding why the PGC isn't trying to attain good forest health statewide?