quote:
But, the less desirable forage is still more than adequate, to maintain max. breeding rates and recruitment. That is why it is called the MSY CC.
Thanks for proving my point that you are concerned about nothing but producing deer no matter what the impact on the habitat or other wildlife.
I did not prove your point because I never said the herd in 2G or 2F should be managed at 40 DPSM.
That may well be happening on some properties. Some landowners and timber interests are short sighted just like the USP and co is short sighted about deer management. That is the decision of the property owners and not yours or mine. Second, what does that have to do with how the PGC manages deer numbers
The point is that if timbering results in high grading and a change of species composition, it will occur despite the reduced deer densities.