""If some of the habitat in 2G is slightly better then some areas of unit 2F then 2G will see a little faster deer population expansion then some areas of 2F though, again based on the evidence from those same habitat sample plots.""

Lets be realistic here. AINT HAPPENIN'! First, the tags are never gonna be at a level to permit herd growth in that timber driven area, also the timbering practices are not going to be changed, so if abiding by the current habitat assessment methods there is no reason to believe much will change in the future.

Next, remember the sham referred to as "C.A.C.S". There are usually 2 "conservationists" that make sure they are on almost every cac and they vote antideer. There are also timber interests etc. etc. And it doesnt matter how many people are on the cac, it only takes 2 dissenting votes to prevent herd growth...Unless the deer herd is borderingon extinction, how many wmus do you think are EVER gonna have EVERYONE on the cac agreeing to MORE deer? (LOL)[:'(] Pgc knew this, that why it is what it is.... Common sense says it SHOULD HAVE BEEN MAJORITY RULE!

So the only "sniff" of a higher deer herd in 2g (and for that matter most wmus) is the one you get when hunters are discussing their false hopes of it occurring in the future, and guys like RSB saying "maybe in another few years" for the next two decades, or until responsible hunter oriented representation becomes the majority on the B.O.C.