Thank you for inadvertently pointing out how your warped view of things causes your distorted posts.

You are forever taking things out of context. Your above statment is not correct, however one simple word would make it so. If you had said....

Forest regeneration ALONEis not an accurate indicator of the carrying capacity of the habitat.

You would have been correct. But then, the differences between deer density management in 2G and 2F and RSB's explanations of same would make sense and that wouldn't fit your agenda now would it?