Just because you don’t understand how wildlife populations are controlled by their habitat doesn’t mean other people more in touch with how nature really works don’t understand it. More and more hunters are becoming more educated about how the deer/habitat balance works so more and more hunters are shifting to my line of thinking all the time.

Since you don’t seem to think unlimited antler less licenses can be a good thing for deer numbers perhaps you can explain how the areas of the state that have had unlimited license for close to two decades now have increasing deer populations even though their past five year average antler less harvest has been more then 4.5 times as high per square mile, city streets included, as it has been in unit 2G.

If they can’t over harvest, or even reduce the deer numbers, with harvests like that why do you believe they could over harvest the deer where it is much harder access with so many seriously remote areas? The fact is that you and bluebird neither one have even the slightest clue how remote the areas of 2G really are or how under hunted the deer area.

R.S. Bodenhorn