ORIGINAL: bluebird2
So now you've backed off the statement you made before when you stated that he didn't undertstand his own research??? ARe you now simply calling Kroll a liar too?
Maybe I should have said Kroll did not understand the significance of the results from his study. He chose to emphasize the fact that culling 1.5 spikes doesn't accomplish anything,while ignoring the fact that his study supported the high grading theory in Miss., which he falsely represented in the article. kroll didn't lie , he just presented the data in a very biased manner in order to support his agenda.
Oh really? And what plan is that? I have not seen you support any AR other than the old failed policy of a 3" spike on one side. Surely you don't want PA to return to that do you?
Please explain why the 3" spike rule was a failed policy. It produced a harvest of more 2.5+ buck in 2002 than we harvested in 2007.
I think RSB summed it up best when he said that you had us fooled into thinking that you were a person of above average intelligence with a personal agenda and a penchant for manipulating the facts. I now agree with RSB that we were giving you far too much credit for your IQ
I'm beginning to agree that you really believe the nonsense you post and that you really do think you know more than a few dozen PHD wildlife biologists
The fact that you want the 3 inch spike rules back combined with the fact that you admitted that you have a hard time seeing deer these days certainly supports the notion that your agenda is purely personal