So now you've backed off the statement you made before when you stated that he didn't undertstand his own research??? ARe you now simply calling Kroll a liar too?
Maybe I should have said Kroll did not understand the significance of the results from his study. He chose to emphasize the fact that culling 1.5 spikes doesn't accomplish anything,while ignoring the fact that his study supported the high grading theory in Miss., which he falsely represented in the article. kroll didn't lie , he just presented the data in a very biased manner in order to support his agenda.
Oh really? And what plan is that? I have not seen you support any AR other than the old failed policy of a 3" spike on one side. Surely you don't want PA to return to that do you?
Please explain why the 3" spike rule was a failed policy. It produced a harvest of more 2.5+ buck in 2002 than we harvested in 2007.