ORIGINAL: bluebird2
You dismiss the research, conclusions and recommendations of wildlife professionalslike Kroll, Samuel, Asheimer etc etc while yousupport the conclusionsof the likes of Lily Huang, an anti hunting rookie reporter for Newsweek
Wrong again. I agree with Kroll that culling 1.5 spikes does no good and I agree that his research accounts for why ARs result in high grading and decreased rack sizes. I also agree with the research results from TX which concluded that a 3pt. AR like ours isn't the right approach to promoting a better buck age structure.
Wrong again! You said that Kroll didnt' understand the results of his own research. That is not only arrogant it is simply clueless and delusional.
Wrong again, again! As for agreeing with the Texas research, you have flatly stated over and over that you support
NO AR program.
BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH!!
Give the old dead horse a break!
