Funny to see on "the other site' a few enviromentalist extremists practically begging for more doe tags for 2A. That being in a wmu that is far below cc, half the ow deer as we had previously, a wmu where the cac didnt vote for less deer and felt the herd was on a reducing trend....A wmu where some of the best habitat in the state exists.... A wmu where Pgc themselves have deemed supposedly that we didnt have too many deer...

Yet a couple of eco-extremeist folks are crying for more tags in 2A to save the habitat and the birds and all else that is holy! (LOL)(LOL)

Speaking of completely rediculous. One said he saw the habitat degraded in the 80's, apparently he had no clue because the herd in 2Awasnt even near its all time high in the 80's. Also, one joker spoke of allocations not being effective in the wmu because its largely private. Unfortunately for his lack of logic, the wmu has been significantly reduced and that isnt even debatable.

Then our compadre Dougie, says that we had way too many deer and now hunters are crying because of the reduction. No dougie, sorry, but hunters dont like the direction was are continuing in. Hunters are NOT crying because we dont have 100 dpsm. Hunters are concerned because we have one third that and are continuing the reduction with far too many tags, even though pgc has claimed otherwise for the last 4 years.

Unreal.[:'(](LOL)...Absolutely unbelievable. Thats whathappens when some of ourfellowhunters are embracing "environmentalists" and their views. You get rediculously extreme deer management ideology based on distorted nonhunter friendly agendas. Another maleffect these people now have open stage forums for the extremist voice to be heard via hunting message sites as well as through a couple of hunting organizations that take in nonhunting conservationists.