HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Why Barnes..
Thread: Why Barnes..
View Single Post
Old 02-13-2009, 08:05 AM
  #5  
Bergcrane2
Fork Horn
 
Bergcrane2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 182
Default RE: Why Barnes..

Here's a good thread talking about it.
http://www.michigan-sportsman.com/fo...+fragment+meat

"go to the NSSF .org site for the whole story
Firearms Industry Statement on Results of CDC Blood Lead Levels in Hunters Study

NEWTOWN, Conn. -- The National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) -- the trade association for the firearms, ammunition, hunting and shooting sports industry -- issued the following statement in response to study results from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), released by the North Dakota Department of Health, showing no evidence that lead or "traditional" ammunition pose any health risk to those who consume game harvested meat.

The CDC report on human lead levels of hunters in North Dakota has confirmed what hunters throughout the world have known for hundreds of years, that traditional ammunition poses no health risk to people and that the call to ban lead ammunition was nothing more than a scare tactic being pushed by anti-hunting groups.

In looking at the study results, the average lead level of the hunters tested was lower than that of the average American. In other words, if you were to randomly pick someone on the street, chances are they would have a higher blood lead level than the hunters in this study.

Also of note, the lead levels of children under 6 in the study had a mean of just 0.88, less than half the national average. Children over 6 had even lower lead levels. The CDC's level of concern for lead in children is 10........"

Bergcrane2 is offline