ORIGINAL: 1sagittarius
Wow, you guys are pathetic.
The DNR allowed the farmer to have the bear because at the time there was no evidence of any wrong doing.
Later, it was learned the SD hunter had attempted to purchase a bear tag during the gun deer season. Flags went up, pieces were put together. The bullet holes were discovered. The DNR then needed the bear carcass for evidence and the investigation.NO different than any police investigation, evidence is gathered, perserved, and secured.
The whole thing is kinda boring standard stuff. This rumor spreading with wild a$$ speculation is for the tabloids. JMHO.
Pathetic huh. You never cease to amaze me sagittarius. What would the dnr say if the farmer decided that he didn't want the bear anymore? Would he get his money back? Knowing our dnr I probably would have to lean towards no!! Exactly what kind of investigation do the geniuses have to do when they have a confession? That seems pretty cut and dried to me, but the idiots in Madison probably would be able to screw that up too. I just can't see why on every post where somebody points out our dnr for wrongdoing you are there to defend them like a little brother denying all wrongdoing. Breach of contract is breach of contract end of story. And the dnr wonders why the logical sportsman of this state hate them!!
Oh and thoughts and prayers with you mrmc54 with your surgery today I hope everything goes well and you have a speedy revovery!!!