No, you couldn't present accurate before and after numbers and instead gave county numbers for one time period and wmu numbers for the other. WMU lines split counties in half and vice versa. No accurate conclusions can be drawn by comparing counties to WMU's
I also provided the current sample sizes and distribution from the 2007 AWR which shows only a total 107 doe were check in 2F and 2G while the combined results for 2B and 5C was 288. That totally negates your and RSB's claim that the 5% decline in breeding rates was die to a shift in sample size and location.