ORIGINAL: R.S.B.
First off Michigan has about 27% more land mass then Pennsylvania and fewer people chewing up their forests so they should have more deer then we have in Pennsylvania. They also have about 39% few hunters so just their hunter success rate certainly should be higher.
New York also has more land mass and fewer hunters than we have in Pennsylvania.
What you propose we do here buy another state to make more land mass or perhaps run half of the people and hunters out of the state to make more room for the few chosen hunters?
Come on man use your head for more then just a hat rack. We have to be more realistic and deal with what is instead of just what we wish.
R.S. Bodenhorn
How can you say that PA is the best state from % of tags sold for deer harvest as in being the best state to hunt deer in? I thought the best hunting state would be one that gave me the best chances of bagging a deer. And by % wise,PA is the worst state to hunt if you want to bag a deer.
And thank you for saying that PA was worse than NY because of less hunters and more land area in NY.