"if pa is such a joke why bother with it got ohio or one of those mid west states then ur poblem is solved"

Because I can.

"First off Michigan has about 27% more land mass then Pennsylvania and fewer people chewing up their forests so they should have more deer then we have in Pennsylvania."

I can point to a helluva lot more states than Michigan as far as deer numbers. Of course Im sure you'd have a different excusefor every single one of them.

"What you propose we do here buy another state to make more land mass or perhaps run half of the people and hunters out of the state to make more room for the few chosen hunters? "

We seemed to have room for over a million and a half. So anything less than that should fit.

"Come on man use your head for more then just a hat rack. We have to be more realistic and deal with what is instead of just what we wish. "

Im not being unrealistic, and I havent said ANYTHING that I wish. YOU made the asnine rediculous claim Pa was one of the very best deer states, and I simply pointed out that it isnt even close. No matter HOW you judge it. Changes need made. THAT Is reality. Im not pointing to 1.5 million deer, in fact I havent offered any number. Things need to be done responsibly and in the interest of hunters to an extent. And they arent. SMALLER WMUS are needed and allocation cuts need made in many areas.

While Id like to see more deer, as they should be, where they can be had across the state, done so with RESPONSIBLE sized wmus....I am more interestedpersonally speaking, in better quality. We were promised more, and it wasnt delivered. In fact, many areas DECLINED!