HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Who Voted?
Thread: Who Voted?
View Single Post
Old 02-05-2009 | 10:54 PM
  #39  
kaibab_hunter74
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
From: The Grand Canyon State
Default RE: Who Voted?



Ok, time to throw my hat into the ring.

How does funding abortion in other nations help decrease our national debt? We are spending millions of dollars to force a issue on nations that requested we not give it to them in the first place, this does not decrease the deficeit but increses it by a large sum.


Holy hell….. How many times does someone need to answer the same question to get people to understand?

What are you talking about? You obviously took this way out of context….. Once again, it’s all about job creation, it gets the unemployed up on their feet andinto the system where they will continuethe flow of national income. The United States isn’t forcing any country to build these clinics, these contriesobviously want them ( that‘s why they‘ve allowed us to proceed )….. America doesn’t force, remember that. It does decrease the yearly deficit!, once again it creates jobs, America will then charge and tax each country who wishes to use these clinics, as well as each women undergoing the procedure ( except taxing ). The gross income will then be taken to the U.S……. and that’s how we make money




Kaibab i guess you havent ever looked at what it takes to buy a firearm CURRANTLY you currantly can not own a firearm if you are a convicted felon, you currantly have to pass background checks to own a firearm depending on your state. But what President Obama has said he wants to do is reinstate the Clinton Weapons Ban, which puts a magazine capacity on all weapons, outlaws the purchasing of weapons that were created for a military or police use from being purchased by a private citizen. The bill that is currantly in congress would instate a fee to apply to be licensed to own a gun, but you can be denied for no reason at the descretion of the Attorny General.


The Clinton Weapons Ban was great actually….. My family bought numerous fire arms during the Clinton presidency and never encountered a problem…….. So what’s wrong with having an ammo capacity for clips? Why do you need a hundred round clip for a weapon?….give me one reasonable answer…… “cause it’s fun” ? lol….. That won’t fly.

Your last sentence in this paragraph has numerous grammatical errors and has poor sentence structure…. It’s fairly tough to follow….. But I’m going to try to answer itfor you……….. I believe the reason the gov. wants to pose a feeon all citizens in the process of applying to purchase a fire arm is simply to make money.

Now you CAN’T be denied for just any old reason…… they have their reasons ( which I don’t have the details on )…. If you think otherwise, please give me some evidence to refer too, instead of just throwing that in there.





Also you claim that they gave their money to ACCORN for the sole reaseon of creating jobs, and we do not have a right to be worried or offended by this action, woulld you say the same to anti-hunting groups if they gave money to organizations that openly support hunting? The could have been given to DU NWTF RMEF, ect. for the same reason it was given to ACCORN but it wasnt, in fact those are larger companies and organizations that are employing more people, and woulld hire more if they had the means.


Funding ACORN or any other similarbusiness, will benefit the economy because they will create JOBS…. (JOB CREATION)….. How many times do I need to state that…… come on now, once more with me: JOB CREATION. Got it now? Do I need to explain to you how job creation helps with national debt too? Those companies: DU NWTF RMEF didn't ask for bailout money, nor did they claim for any fincial help.... that's why ACORN is GOING to recieve money ( they haven't yet ).... pretty simple to figure out actually..... You're acting like the bailout package is bias or something.



You also are blindly following Obama thinking that he is different from every other member of his party when it comes to taxes, wrong, i see him increasing taxes in his upcoming years, or else he will bankcrupt our nation spending on things that our nation cant offord, nor even attempting on getting the money to pay them, refer back to my first paragraph for the example of unnecesary spending





This statement truly makes your arrogance shine.

Where have I said and or shown that I am blinded by following Obama ( I never once claimed he was any different than the rest of the Democrats ) when it comes to taxes??????

Of course he will increase taxes… I’ve said that numerous times before in this thread. Did you actually read any of it? You must not have……

Just incase you haven’t noticed…. The country is bankrupt…. We’ve been in this situation for about 5 years now……. We do spend money we don’t have on things we don’t need nor that we can afford. For example, GWB’s favorite: the Iraq War ( which has cost billions and has been a complete failure ) and the once again the Bush Tax Cuts……

Now finally but not the least; how is the Obama Admin. ot attempting to get any of this money back? He’s ending the Iraq war, and launching a massive stimulus package that will: hence the word STIMULATE the economy. I would call that, ATTEMPTING to gain all losses back.

BTW: Let’s not forget who it was that produced this country’s last BUDGET SURPLUS…. Bill Clinton ( Democrat )


kaibab_hunter74 is offline  
Reply