Actually if you want to think of it that way, THEY should be paying US restitution.

"But this money needs to go to habitat. If policies or programs are created for the sole purpose of habitat then put 100% of that money into habitat. Don't distribute it among other progams."

Dont ever count on it. The pgc crowd are talking on another board about the new bill that would mandate that pgc would set aside at least 10% of the money they get from timbering towards habitat improvement/reforestation efforts. They are DEAD SET againstit, and again we areonly talking TEN STINKING PERCENT!!

That tells me exactly how concerned they are with hunting, hunters and the habitat. Theyd rather have extra money at all times in case they have to answer for wrong doings, making them have to go without approved fee increases etc. All so they can cater to tree hugging allies.